I came away with awe and envy of Judge John Paul Stevens' intellect, undiminished at his advanced age.
Toobin does state that during the aftermath of the election of 2000, "...the justices displayed all of their worst traits--among them vanity, overconfidence, impatience, arrogance , and simple political partisanship. These three weeks taint an otherwise largely admirable legacy. The justices did almost everything wrong. They embarrassed themselves and the Supreme Court." David Souter was the only justice who was "shattered" by Bush v. Gore. He believed this case "mocked" the tradition "where the independence of the judiciary was the foundation of the rule of law." The other justices just "tried to put Bush v. Gore behind them..."
Justice Stevens said "Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is pellucidly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law." And Toobin goes on to say that one of Stevens's clerks "...prevailed on him, just this once, to give up his favorite word--pellucidly--and substitute the more familiar [word] perfectly, which is how the famous sentence now reads."